This free survey is powered by
  1. Surveys
  2. 2015
  3. October
  4. A
  5. ASMNT of OSR: PEER

ASMNT of OSR: PEER

0%
Exit Survey
 
 
Hello!

You are invited to participate in the assessment of CAPTE's Onsite-Review Team. It will take approximately 5 minutes to complete and your participation is entirely voluntary.

This survey is intended for Institutional Administrators, Program Directors, Academic Administrators, and each faculty member who: 1) Contributed to the program's Self-study Report, 2) Participated in the on-site visit, and/or 3) is familiar with the education program and self-study material.

Your candid responses will be used to provide feedback to each on-site reviewer and to guide us in the selection, orientation, and training of on-site reviewers.

Please
 
 
Identify your institution?
 
ASU
 
USF
 
UCF
 
SPC
 
 
Please rate the following for the TEAM LEADER:

If you did not observe the team member, select "Not Observed"
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Not Observed
Demonstrated a thorough knowledge and understanding of the Evaluative Criteria/Standards and Elements.
Demonstrated a thorough knowledge of the Self-Study Report submitted by the program.
Demonstrated effective communication skills throughout the visit.
Demonstrated effective interpersonal relations throughout the visit.
Demonstrated appropriate stature, credibility and competence as a team leader.
Demonstrated integrity.
Demonstrated objectivity by comparing the program to the Evaluative Criteria/Standards and Elements, not to personal experience.
Arrived on time for all assigned sessions.
Contributed to an open, honest, and non-threatening atmosphere during interview and discussion sessions with program faculty, administrators, etc.
Raised pertinent relevant questions during the interview sessions.
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Not Observed
Requested pertinent additional material to review the program as needed.
Gave appropriate attention to the program and to all factors that influence it relative to compliance with the Evaluative Criteria/Standards and Elements.
Made comments and suggestions that were reasonable, realistic, and constructive.
Participated in the discussion of the final Exit Summary with the program administrators, faculty, and students.
Communicated in a timely fashion with team members and program director prior to visit.
Mentored team members in process and brought the group together.
Managed an appropriate visit schedule.
Sought input from all team members in interviews and written report.
Delegated responsibilities to team members effectively.
Was able to keep discussion focused on relevant issues.
Handled sensitive issues appropriately.
Asked program director for additional information when needed by the team.
 
 
Please rate the following for the CLINICIAN:

If you did not observe the team member, select "Not Observed"
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Not Observed
Demonstrated a thorough knowledge and understanding of the Evaluative Criteria/Standards and Elements.
Demonstrated a thorough knowledge of the Self-Study Report submitted by the program.
Demonstrated effective communication skills throughout the visit.
Demonstrated effective interpersonal relations throughout the visit.
Demonstrated appropriate stature, credibility and competence as a team leader.
Demonstrated integrity.
Demonstrated objectivity by comparing the program to the Evaluative Criteria/Standards and Elements, not to personal experience.
Arrived on time for all assigned sessions.
Contributed to an open, honest, and non-threatening atmosphere during interview and discussion sessions with program faculty, administrators, etc.
Raised pertinent relevant questions during the interview sessions.
Requested pertinent additional material to review the program as needed.
Gave appropriate attention to the program and to all factors that influence it relative to compliance with the Evaluative Criteria/Standards and Elements.
Made comments and suggestions that were reasonable, realistic, and constructive.
Participated in the discussion of the final Exit Summary with the program administrators, faculty, and students.
 
 
Please rate the following for the ADMINISTRATOR:

If you did not observe the team member, select "Not Observed"
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Not Observed
Demonstrated a thorough knowledge and understanding of the Evaluative Criteria/Standards and Elements.
Demonstrated a thorough knowledge of the Self-Study Report submitted by the program.
Demonstrated effective communication skills throughout the visit.
Demonstrated effective interpersonal relations throughout the visit.
Demonstrated appropriate stature, credibility and competence as a team leader.
Demonstrated integrity.
Demonstrated objectivity by comparing the program to the Evaluative Criteria/Standards and Elements, not to personal experience.
Arrived on time for all assigned sessions.
Contributed to an open, honest, and non-threatening atmosphere during interview and discussion sessions with program faculty, administrators, etc.
Raised pertinent relevant questions during the interview sessions.
Requested pertinent additional material to review the program as needed.
Gave appropriate attention to the program and to all factors that influence it relative to compliance with the Evaluative Criteria/Standards and Elements.
Made comments and suggestions that were reasonable, realistic, and constructive.
Participated in the discussion of the final Exit Summary with the program administrators, faculty, and students.
 
 
Please rate the following for the TEAM LEADER IN TRAINING:

If you did not observe the team member, select "Not Observed"
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Not Observed
Demonstrated a thorough knowledge and understanding of the Evaluative Criteria/Standards and Elements.
Demonstrated a thorough knowledge of the Self-Study Report submitted by the program.
Demonstrated effective communication skills throughout the visit.
Demonstrated effective interpersonal relations throughout the visit.
Demonstrated appropriate stature, credibility and competence as a team leader.
Demonstrated integrity.
Demonstrated objectivity by comparing the program to the Evaluative Criteria/Standards and Elements, not to personal experience.
Arrived on time for all assigned sessions.
Contributed to an open, honest, and non-threatening atmosphere during interview and discussion sessions with program faculty, administrators, etc.
Raised pertinent relevant questions during the interview sessions.
Requested pertinent additional material to review the program as needed.
Gave appropriate attention to the program and to all factors that influence it relative to compliance with the Evaluative Criteria/Standards and Elements.
Made comments and suggestions that were reasonable, realistic, and constructive.
Participated in the discussion of the final Exit Summary with the program administrators, faculty, and students.
 
 
 
Comments/Suggestions:
   
Team Leader
   
Clinician
   
Administrator
   
Team Leader in Training