|
Hello:
You have been chosen as an evaluator of regarding:
RFP 12-06-001 CONTENT MANAGEMENT SOLUTION
The evaluation of this RFP will consist of 3 ROUNDS (parts):
1) An initial independent evaluation of the proposals 2) A secondary evaluation following a group discussion on various proposal points 3) A third evaluation following a discussion with key vendors
Your evaluation and responses will be captured here so that we can keep an accurate track of the process.
You should have received either hardcopy or electronic copy of the RFPs for your review. If you do NOT have these, please contact Larry Millholland @ [email protected]
Thank you for your support in this process. If you have any questions, please contact me at 317-916-7921.
|
| |
|
|
|
* You are here to complete what step? |
| |
|
|
|
ROUND 1 - EVC (ACADEMICA GROUP)
|
|
| |
|
|
ROUND 1 - EVC (ACADEMICA GROUP)
|
|
| Poor Value | Excellent Value |
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
| * ROUND 1 - Initial independent evaluation comments for EVC (ACADEMICA GROUP): | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Poor Value | Excellent Value |
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
| * ROUND 1 - Initial independent evaluation comments for TERMINAL FOUR: | | |
|
|
|
ROUND 1 - RIVET LOGIC (LIFERAY)
|
|
| |
|
|
ROUND 1 - RIVET LOGIC (LIFERAY)
|
|
| Poor Value | Excellent Value |
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
| * ROUND 1 - Initial independent evaluation comments for RIVET LOGIC (LIFERAY): | | |
|
|
|
|
* ROUND 2 - After the group discussion, has your opinion changed? Do you wish to re-score the vendors? |
| |
|
|
|
|
ROUND 2 EVALUATION - After Group Discussion |
| |
|
|
ROUND 2 - EVC (ACADEMICA GROUP)
|
|
| |
|
|
ROUND 2 - EVC (Academica Group)
|
|
| Poor Value | Excellent Value |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
|
| * ROUND 2 - Evaluation comments for EVC (ACADEMICA GROUP): | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Poor Value | Excellent Value |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
|
| * ROUND 2 - Evaluation comments for TERMINAL FOUR: | | |
|
|
|
ROUND 2 - RIVET LOGIC (LIFERAY)
|
|
| |
|
|
ROUND 2 - RIVET LOGIC (LIFERAY)
|
|
| Poor Value | Excellent Value |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
|
| * ROUND 2 - Evaluation comments for RIVET LOGIC (LIFERAY): | | |
|
|
|
|
* ROUND 3 - After the vendor Interviews/discussion, has your opinion changed? Do you wish to re-score the vendors? |
| |
|
|
|
|
ROUND 3 EVALUATION - After Vendor Discussion/Interview |
| |
|
|
ROUND 3 - EVC (ACADEMICA GROUP)
|
|
| |
|
|
ROUND 3 - EVC (ACADEMICA GROUP)
|
|
| Poor Value | Excellent Value |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
|
| * ROUND 3 - Evaluation comments for EVC (ACADEMICA GROUP): | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Poor Value | Excellent Value |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
|
| * ROUND 3 - Evaluation comments for TERMINAL FOUR: | | |
|
|
|
ROUND 3 - RIVET LOGIC (LIFERAY)
|
|
| |
|
|
ROUND 3 - RIVET LOGIC (LIFERAY)
|
|
| Poor Value | Excellent Value |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
|
| * ROUND 3 - Evaluation comments for RIVET LOGIC (LIFERAY): | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* *** RANDOM CONFIDENTIAL QUESTION ***
In some evaluations, strong pre-conceived bias can develop. This can lead some evaluation members to consciously/unconsciously attempt to sway the evaluation team to their view. While group discussion, persuasion and passion are all a part of evaluations, coercion is not acceptable and it places a true neutral evaluation at risk.
Do you feel that you were coerced (or under any duress) to score a vendor in any certain way? |
| |
Please explain who/why you feel this way? Please explain who/why you feel this way? |
|
|
|
* Which Evaluator are you? |
| |
|
|
|