MC^2 club feedback

Exit Survey

I would have appreciated more discussion on

The Schrodinger-Poisson equation and underlying theory

Computational methods used

Results

Other

Could you follow the topic?

Yes

No

I spoke

Clearly

Too fast

Too quietly

The talk could have

More technical details

More overview

The technical scope of the talk was discussing about the methods of deriving the analytical soliton profile and using it to fit to the Fornax Dwarf data. I mentioned debate about Fornax Dwarf observations and some comments on ultralight bosons from the particle physics side without going into details. The latter debate and comments on ultralight bosons:

Were useful to hear about

Should be dropped

Should be discussed less

No opinion

I dropped the discussion on error estimates of Fornax Dwarf observations, and instead commented on the arguments leading to using analytical soliton profile to fit the Fornax data.

This was an OK decision

This was confusing

Observations should have more technical discussion

Soliton profiles should have more technical discussion

Both observations and soliton profiles should have more technical discussion

Other comments:

Will you also make a questionnaire on your presentation?

Yes

No