SHARE THIS REPORT:      
Survey Report : Administrator AT Survey
Survey Statistics
 
Viewed0
Started27
Completed 27
Completion Rate100%
Drop Outs (After Starting)0
  • Average time taken to complete survey : 10 minute(s)

1. Campus where your are located (Please check all that apply):
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Duluth2388.46%
2.Brainerd13.85%
3.St. Cloud13.85%
4.St. Paul13.85%
5.Rochester00.00%
Total26100%
Key Analytics
Mean1.231
Key Facts
  • 92.31% chose the following options :
    • Duluth
    • Brainerd
Confidence Interval @ 95%[0.958 - 1.504]
n = 26
Standard Deviation0.710
Standard Error0.139

2. Please indicate whether you are faculty or staff:
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Faculty2180.77%
2.Staff519.23%
Total26100%
Key Analytics
Mean1.192
Confidence Interval @ 95%[1.038 - 1.347]
n = 26
Standard Deviation0.402
Standard Error0.079

3. Please read the following statements and indicate your agreement or disagreement:
Overall Matrix Scorecard
Question Count Score
Agree stronglyAgreeNeutralDisagreeDisagree stronglyNot applicable
1.A. In hiring faculty, a candidate's interest in the use of technology plays a role in determining his or her eligibility for a position:272.852
2.B. I encourage faculty to participate in technology training sessions:272.444
3.C. I initiate or organize faculty technology training sessions:273.704
4.D. I provide tangible support (e.g. funding, release time, etc.) for professional development opportunities that relate to technology:273.481
5.E. CSS faculty in my area of responsibility are currently available and prepared to meet the demands of institutional and/or departmental plans in the area of academic technology:272.778
6.F. I would like to use technology more in the assessment of student learning:272.667
7.G. The College needs to develop a strategic plan to address the issues of technology infrastructure, training, release time (or funding), and support needed by faculty:272.037
8.H. CSS faculty who teach "traditional" on-site classes should explore opportunities provided by academic technology, such as supplemental Web sites or the use of WebCT:272.481
9.I. I think it's important to recruit, mentor, and develop faculty who can use technology to meet the changing demands of the academic market:272.370
10.J. The use of online technologies as a supplement to face to face courses, can prepare the College to support future needs for online instruction:272.296
11.K. Technology, and specifically WebCT, has the potential to serve a strategic role in terms of contingency/disaster planning (e.g. online program delivery in the event of a pandemic or other emergency):262.808
12.I. Professional development in the area of technology can poise The College for long range autonomy, academic readiness, and excellence:272.444
13.M. If CSS is to remain competitive, we need to explore offering more courses and/or programs online:272.519
14.N. I believe that it is in the College's best interests to encourage faculty to build skills needed to develop and teach online courses:272.296
15.O. Professional development in the area of teaching technologies involves on-the-job training as well as other opportunities such as workshops and demonstrations:272.000
16.P. As an administrator, I seek to recognize faculty achievement in the area of instructional technology:272.630
Average2.613

A. In hiring faculty, a candidate's interest in the use of technology plays a role in determining his or her eligibility for a position:
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Agree strongly414.81%
2.Agree933.33%
3.Neutral829.63%
4.Disagree27.41%
5.Disagree strongly13.70%
6.Not applicable311.11%
Total27100%
Key Analytics
Mean2.852
Key Facts
  • 62.96% chose the following options :
    • Agree
    • Neutral
  • Least chosen option 3.7% :
    • Disagree strongly
Confidence Interval @ 95%[2.291 - 3.412]
n = 27
Standard Deviation1.486
Standard Error0.286

B. I encourage faculty to participate in technology training sessions:
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Agree strongly518.52%
2.Agree1555.56%
3.Neutral311.11%
4.Disagree13.70%
5.Disagree strongly00.00%
6.Not applicable311.11%
Total27100%
Key Analytics
Mean2.444
Key Facts
  • 74.07% chose the following options :
    • Agree
    • Agree strongly
Confidence Interval @ 95%[1.897 - 2.991]
n = 27
Standard Deviation1.450
Standard Error0.279

C. I initiate or organize faculty technology training sessions:
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Agree strongly13.70%
2.Agree829.63%
3.Neutral311.11%
4.Disagree725.93%
5.Disagree strongly27.41%
6.Not applicable622.22%
Total27100%
Key Analytics
Mean3.704
Key Facts
  • 55.56% chose the following options :
    • Agree
    • Disagree
  • Least chosen option 3.7% :
    • Agree strongly
Confidence Interval @ 95%[3.095 - 4.312]
n = 27
Standard Deviation1.613
Standard Error0.310

D. I provide tangible support (e.g. funding, release time, etc.) for professional development opportunities that relate to technology:
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Agree strongly311.11%
2.Agree725.93%
3.Neutral518.52%
4.Disagree414.81%
5.Disagree strongly27.41%
6.Not applicable622.22%
Total27100%
Key Analytics
Mean3.481
Key Facts
  • 48.15% chose the following options :
    • Agree
    • Not applicable
  • Least chosen option 7.41% :
    • Disagree strongly
Confidence Interval @ 95%[2.825 - 4.138]
n = 27
Standard Deviation1.740
Standard Error0.335

E. CSS faculty in my area of responsibility are currently available and prepared to meet the demands of institutional and/or departmental plans in the area of academic technology:
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Agree strongly27.41%
2.Agree1348.15%
3.Neutral518.52%
4.Disagree518.52%
5.Disagree strongly00.00%
6.Not applicable27.41%
Total27100%
Key Analytics
Mean2.778
Key Facts
  • 66.67% chose the following options :
    • Agree
    • Neutral
Confidence Interval @ 95%[2.295 - 3.261]
n = 27
Standard Deviation1.281
Standard Error0.247

F. I would like to use technology more in the assessment of student learning:
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Agree strongly311.11%
2.Agree1244.44%
3.Neutral622.22%
4.Disagree414.81%
5.Disagree strongly13.70%
6.Not applicable13.70%
Total27100%
Key Analytics
Mean2.667
Key Facts
  • 66.67% chose the following options :
    • Agree
    • Neutral
  • Least chosen option 3.7% :
    • Disagree strongly
Confidence Interval @ 95%[2.211 - 3.123]
n = 27
Standard Deviation1.209
Standard Error0.233

G. The College needs to develop a strategic plan to address the issues of technology infrastructure, training, release time (or funding), and support needed by faculty:
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Agree strongly1037.04%
2.Agree829.63%
3.Neutral829.63%
4.Disagree00.00%
5.Disagree strongly13.70%
6.Not applicable00.00%
Total27100%
Key Analytics
Mean2.037
Key Facts
  • 66.67% chose the following options :
    • Agree strongly
    • Agree
Confidence Interval @ 95%[1.653 - 2.421]
n = 27
Standard Deviation1.018
Standard Error0.196

H. CSS faculty who teach "traditional" on-site classes should explore opportunities provided by academic technology, such as supplemental Web sites or the use of WebCT:
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Agree strongly518.52%
2.Agree1037.04%
3.Neutral829.63%
4.Disagree27.41%
5.Disagree strongly27.41%
6.Not applicable00.00%
Total27100%
Key Analytics
Mean2.481
Key Facts
  • 66.67% chose the following options :
    • Agree
    • Neutral
Confidence Interval @ 95%[2.058 - 2.905]
n = 27
Standard Deviation1.122
Standard Error0.216

I. I think it's important to recruit, mentor, and develop faculty who can use technology to meet the changing demands of the academic market:
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Agree strongly518.52%
2.Agree1348.15%
3.Neutral622.22%
4.Disagree13.70%
5.Disagree strongly13.70%
6.Not applicable13.70%
Total27100%
Key Analytics
Mean2.370
Key Facts
  • 70.37% chose the following options :
    • Agree
    • Neutral
  • Least chosen option 3.7% :
    • Disagree
Confidence Interval @ 95%[1.925 - 2.816]
n = 27
Standard Deviation1.182
Standard Error0.227

J. The use of online technologies as a supplement to face to face courses, can prepare the College to support future needs for online instruction:
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Agree strongly622.22%
2.Agree1244.44%
3.Neutral622.22%
4.Disagree13.70%
5.Disagree strongly27.41%
6.Not applicable00.00%
Total27100%
Key Analytics
Mean2.296
Key Facts
  • 66.67% chose the following options :
    • Agree
    • Agree strongly
Confidence Interval @ 95%[1.880 - 2.712]
n = 27
Standard Deviation1.103
Standard Error0.212

K. Technology, and specifically WebCT, has the potential to serve a strategic role in terms of contingency/disaster planning (e.g. online program delivery in the event of a pandemic or other emergency):
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Agree strongly311.54%
2.Agree726.92%
3.Neutral1142.31%
4.Disagree311.54%
5.Disagree strongly13.85%
6.Not applicable13.85%
Total26100%
Key Analytics
Mean2.808
Key Facts
  • 69.23% chose the following options :
    • Neutral
    • Agree
  • Least chosen option 3.85% :
    • Disagree strongly
Confidence Interval @ 95%[2.359 - 3.256]
n = 26
Standard Deviation1.167
Standard Error0.229

I. Professional development in the area of technology can poise The College for long range autonomy, academic readiness, and excellence:
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Agree strongly414.81%
2.Agree1244.44%
3.Neutral829.63%
4.Disagree13.70%
5.Disagree strongly27.41%
6.Not applicable00.00%
Total27100%
Key Analytics
Mean2.444
Key Facts
  • 74.07% chose the following options :
    • Agree
    • Neutral
Confidence Interval @ 95%[2.048 - 2.841]
n = 27
Standard Deviation1.050
Standard Error0.202

M. If CSS is to remain competitive, we need to explore offering more courses and/or programs online:
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Agree strongly622.22%
2.Agree933.33%
3.Neutral725.93%
4.Disagree27.41%
5.Disagree strongly311.11%
6.Not applicable00.00%
Total27100%
Key Analytics
Mean2.519
Key Facts
  • 59.26% chose the following options :
    • Agree
    • Neutral
Confidence Interval @ 95%[2.046 - 2.991]
n = 27
Standard Deviation1.252
Standard Error0.241

N. I believe that it is in the College's best interests to encourage faculty to build skills needed to develop and teach online courses:
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Agree strongly622.22%
2.Agree1244.44%
3.Neutral622.22%
4.Disagree13.70%
5.Disagree strongly27.41%
6.Not applicable00.00%
Total27100%
Key Analytics
Mean2.296
Key Facts
  • 66.67% chose the following options :
    • Agree
    • Agree strongly
Confidence Interval @ 95%[1.880 - 2.712]
n = 27
Standard Deviation1.103
Standard Error0.212

O. Professional development in the area of teaching technologies involves on-the-job training as well as other opportunities such as workshops and demonstrations:
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Agree strongly518.52%
2.Agree1762.96%
3.Neutral518.52%
4.Disagree00.00%
5.Disagree strongly00.00%
6.Not applicable00.00%
Total27100%
Key Analytics
Mean2.000
Key Facts
  • 81.48% chose the following options :
    • Agree
    • Agree strongly
Confidence Interval @ 95%[1.766 - 2.234]
n = 27
Standard Deviation0.620
Standard Error0.119

P. As an administrator, I seek to recognize faculty achievement in the area of instructional technology:
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Agree strongly27.41%
2.Agree1244.44%
3.Neutral933.33%
4.Disagree311.11%
5.Disagree strongly00.00%
6.Not applicable13.70%
Total27100%
Key Analytics
Mean2.630
Key Facts
  • 77.78% chose the following options :
    • Agree
    • Neutral
Confidence Interval @ 95%[2.236 - 3.023]
n = 27
Standard Deviation1.043
Standard Error0.201

4. Please indicate which CSS-based academic technology services you are aware of: (Please check all that apply)
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Academic Technology Institute (annual day or training)1713.82%
2.WebCT training (ongoing)2419.51%
3.Software training2016.26%
4.One-on-one consultation/support1915.45%
5.Existence of faculty showcase (TECHO)1512.20%
6.Support for Web site or online course development2117.07%
7.Technology resources (e.g. Academic Technology Center Web site, MORF site, software documentation, etc.)75.69%
8.Not applicable (I am not familiar with any of these services)00.00%
9.Other00.00%
Total123100%
Key Analytics
Mean3.667
Key Facts
  • 36.59% chose the following options :
    • WebCT training (ongoing)
    • Support for Web site or online course development
Confidence Interval @ 95%[3.340 - 3.994]
n = 123
Standard Deviation1.850
Standard Error0.167

7. I am aware of the following technologies used to enhance teaching and learning at CSS:
Overall Matrix Scorecard
Question Count Score
ImportantUnsureUnimportant
1.Student Response Systems ("classroom clickers")241.750
2.Whiteboard241.542
3.Classroom computer251.000
4.LCD projector241.000
5.PDA such as a Palm Pilot252.280
6.MP3 Player242.417
7.Tablet PC241.708
8.VHS/DVD Player251.040
9.Music or other audio261.500
10.Video261.077
11.Technology Classroom (Duluth Campus)231.348
12.Mobile/Wireless Lab251.360
13.Wireless Internet251.280
14.Computer Lab241.083
15.WebCT site251.400
16.Document camera (Elmo)251.560
17.Web site251.200
18.RSS-enabled resources (e.g. blogs, podcasts, etc.)232.000
19.Online meetings231.826
20.Telephone Conferencing251.440
21.Simulations251.560
22.Animations241.875
23.Learning objects231.783
24.Interactive games (online)232.087
25.PowerPoint presentations251.280
26.Troubleshooting and support251.040
27.Other42.000
Average1.535

Student Response Systems ("classroom clickers")
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Important729.17%
2.Unsure1666.67%
3.Unimportant14.17%
Total24100%
Key Analytics
Mean1.750
Key Facts
  • 95.83% chose the following options :
    • Unsure
    • Important
  • Least chosen option 4.17% :
    • Unimportant
Confidence Interval @ 95%[1.537 - 1.963]
n = 24
Standard Deviation0.532
Standard Error0.109

Whiteboard
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Important1145.83%
2.Unsure1354.17%
3.Unimportant00.00%
Total24100%
Key Analytics
Mean1.542
Key Facts
  • 100% chose the following options :
    • Unsure
    • Important
Confidence Interval @ 95%[1.338 - 1.745]
n = 24
Standard Deviation0.509
Standard Error0.104

Classroom computer
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Important25100.00%
2.Unsure00.00%
3.Unimportant00.00%
Total25100%
Key Analytics
Mean1.000
Confidence Interval @ 95%[1.000 - 1.000]
n = 25
Standard Deviation0.000
Standard Error0.000

LCD projector
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Important24100.00%
2.Unsure00.00%
3.Unimportant00.00%
Total24100%
Key Analytics
Mean1.000
Confidence Interval @ 95%[1.000 - 1.000]
n = 24
Standard Deviation0.000
Standard Error0.000

PDA such as a Palm Pilot
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Important520.00%
2.Unsure832.00%
3.Unimportant1248.00%
Total25100%
Key Analytics
Mean2.280
Key Facts
  • 80% chose the following options :
    • Unimportant
    • Unsure
  • Least chosen option 20% :
    • Important
Confidence Interval @ 95%[1.970 - 2.590]
n = 25
Standard Deviation0.792
Standard Error0.158

MP3 Player
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Important28.33%
2.Unsure1041.67%
3.Unimportant1250.00%
Total24100%
Key Analytics
Mean2.417
Key Facts
  • 91.67% chose the following options :
    • Unimportant
    • Unsure
  • Least chosen option 8.33% :
    • Important
Confidence Interval @ 95%[2.155 - 2.678]
n = 24
Standard Deviation0.654
Standard Error0.133

Tablet PC
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Important833.33%
2.Unsure1562.50%
3.Unimportant14.17%
Total24100%
Key Analytics
Mean1.708
Key Facts
  • 95.83% chose the following options :
    • Unsure
    • Important
  • Least chosen option 4.17% :
    • Unimportant
Confidence Interval @ 95%[1.488 - 1.928]
n = 24
Standard Deviation0.550
Standard Error0.112

VHS/DVD Player
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Important2496.00%
2.Unsure14.00%
3.Unimportant00.00%
Total25100%
Key Analytics
Mean1.040
Key Facts
  • 100% chose the following options :
    • Important
    • Unsure
Confidence Interval @ 95%[0.962 - 1.118]
n = 25
Standard Deviation0.200
Standard Error0.040

Music or other audio
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Important1661.54%
2.Unsure726.92%
3.Unimportant311.54%
Total26100%
Key Analytics
Mean1.500
Key Facts
  • 88.46% chose the following options :
    • Important
    • Unsure
  • Least chosen option 11.54% :
    • Unimportant
Confidence Interval @ 95%[1.228 - 1.772]
n = 26
Standard Deviation0.707
Standard Error0.139

Video
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Important2596.15%
2.Unsure00.00%
3.Unimportant13.85%
Total26100%
Key Analytics
Mean1.077
Key Facts
  • 100% chose the following options :
    • Important
    • Unimportant
Confidence Interval @ 95%[0.926 - 1.228]
n = 26
Standard Deviation0.392
Standard Error0.077

Technology Classroom (Duluth Campus)
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Important1669.57%
2.Unsure626.09%
3.Unimportant14.35%
Total23100%
Key Analytics
Mean1.348
Key Facts
  • 95.65% chose the following options :
    • Important
    • Unsure
  • Least chosen option 4.35% :
    • Unimportant
Confidence Interval @ 95%[1.114 - 1.582]
n = 23
Standard Deviation0.573
Standard Error0.119

Mobile/Wireless Lab
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Important1768.00%
2.Unsure728.00%
3.Unimportant14.00%
Total25100%
Key Analytics
Mean1.360
Key Facts
  • 96% chose the following options :
    • Important
    • Unsure
  • Least chosen option 4% :
    • Unimportant
Confidence Interval @ 95%[1.137 - 1.583]
n = 25
Standard Deviation0.569
Standard Error0.114

Wireless Internet
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Important1872.00%
2.Unsure728.00%
3.Unimportant00.00%
Total25100%
Key Analytics
Mean1.280
Key Facts
  • 100% chose the following options :
    • Important
    • Unsure
Confidence Interval @ 95%[1.100 - 1.460]
n = 25
Standard Deviation0.458
Standard Error0.092

Computer Lab
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Important2291.67%
2.Unsure28.33%
3.Unimportant00.00%
Total24100%
Key Analytics
Mean1.083
Key Facts
  • 100% chose the following options :
    • Important
    • Unsure
Confidence Interval @ 95%[0.970 - 1.196]
n = 24
Standard Deviation0.282
Standard Error0.058

WebCT site
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Important1560.00%
2.Unsure1040.00%
3.Unimportant00.00%
Total25100%
Key Analytics
Mean1.400
Key Facts
  • 100% chose the following options :
    • Important
    • Unsure
Confidence Interval @ 95%[1.204 - 1.596]
n = 25
Standard Deviation0.500
Standard Error0.100

Document camera (Elmo)
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Important1248.00%
2.Unsure1248.00%
3.Unimportant14.00%
Total25100%
Key Analytics
Mean1.560
Key Facts
  • 96% chose the following options :
    • Important
    • Unsure
  • Least chosen option 4% :
    • Unimportant
Confidence Interval @ 95%[1.331 - 1.789]
n = 25
Standard Deviation0.583
Standard Error0.117

Web site
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Important2080.00%
2.Unsure520.00%
3.Unimportant00.00%
Total25100%
Key Analytics
Mean1.200
Key Facts
  • 100% chose the following options :
    • Important
    • Unsure
Confidence Interval @ 95%[1.040 - 1.360]
n = 25
Standard Deviation0.408
Standard Error0.082

RSS-enabled resources (e.g. blogs, podcasts, etc.)
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Important417.39%
2.Unsure1565.22%
3.Unimportant417.39%
Total23100%
Key Analytics
Mean2.000
Key Facts
  • Least chosen option 17.39% :
    • Important
Confidence Interval @ 95%[1.754 - 2.246]
n = 23
Standard Deviation0.603
Standard Error0.126

Online meetings
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Important834.78%
2.Unsure1147.83%
3.Unimportant417.39%
Total23100%
Key Analytics
Mean1.826
Key Facts
  • 82.61% chose the following options :
    • Unsure
    • Important
  • Least chosen option 17.39% :
    • Unimportant
Confidence Interval @ 95%[1.533 - 2.119]
n = 23
Standard Deviation0.717
Standard Error0.149

Telephone Conferencing
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Important1768.00%
2.Unsure520.00%
3.Unimportant312.00%
Total25100%
Key Analytics
Mean1.440
Key Facts
  • 88% chose the following options :
    • Important
    • Unsure
  • Least chosen option 12% :
    • Unimportant
Confidence Interval @ 95%[1.161 - 1.719]
n = 25
Standard Deviation0.712
Standard Error0.142

Simulations
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Important1248.00%
2.Unsure1248.00%
3.Unimportant14.00%
Total25100%
Key Analytics
Mean1.560
Key Facts
  • 96% chose the following options :
    • Important
    • Unsure
  • Least chosen option 4% :
    • Unimportant
Confidence Interval @ 95%[1.331 - 1.789]
n = 25
Standard Deviation0.583
Standard Error0.117

Animations
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Important625.00%
2.Unsure1562.50%
3.Unimportant312.50%
Total24100%
Key Analytics
Mean1.875
Key Facts
  • 87.5% chose the following options :
    • Unsure
    • Important
  • Least chosen option 12.5% :
    • Unimportant
Confidence Interval @ 95%[1.630 - 2.120]
n = 24
Standard Deviation0.612
Standard Error0.125

Learning objects
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Important730.43%
2.Unsure1460.87%
3.Unimportant28.70%
Total23100%
Key Analytics
Mean1.783
Key Facts
  • 91.3% chose the following options :
    • Unsure
    • Important
  • Least chosen option 8.7% :
    • Unimportant
Confidence Interval @ 95%[1.538 - 2.028]
n = 23
Standard Deviation0.600
Standard Error0.125

Interactive games (online)
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Important417.39%
2.Unsure1356.52%
3.Unimportant626.09%
Total23100%
Key Analytics
Mean2.087
Key Facts
  • 82.61% chose the following options :
    • Unsure
    • Unimportant
  • Least chosen option 17.39% :
    • Important
Confidence Interval @ 95%[1.814 - 2.360]
n = 23
Standard Deviation0.668
Standard Error0.139

PowerPoint presentations
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Important2080.00%
2.Unsure312.00%
3.Unimportant28.00%
Total25100%
Key Analytics
Mean1.280
Key Facts
  • 92% chose the following options :
    • Important
    • Unsure
  • Least chosen option 8% :
    • Unimportant
Confidence Interval @ 95%[1.039 - 1.521]
n = 25
Standard Deviation0.614
Standard Error0.123

Troubleshooting and support
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Important2496.00%
2.Unsure14.00%
3.Unimportant00.00%
Total25100%
Key Analytics
Mean1.040
Key Facts
  • 100% chose the following options :
    • Important
    • Unsure
Confidence Interval @ 95%[0.962 - 1.118]
n = 25
Standard Deviation0.200
Standard Error0.040

Other
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Important00.00%
2.Unsure4100.00%
3.Unimportant00.00%
Total4100%
Key Analytics
Mean2.000
Confidence Interval @ 95%[2.000 - 2.000]
n = 4
Standard Deviation0.000
Standard Error0.000

8. Please indicate the time you believe that CSS faculty in your area of responsibility spend during an average week using WebCT, tablet PC, portable lab, Impatica for Powerpoint, Powerpoint, StudyMate, Respondus, Student Response System ("classroom clickers"), or other technology resources to develop course materials or to deliver and enhance instruction:
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Fewer than 3 hours per week834.78%
2.3-7 hours per week626.09%
3.7-11 hours per week626.09%
4.11-14 hours per week14.35%
5.14-19 hours per week00.00%
6.More than 19 hours per week28.70%
7.Not applicable00.00%
Total23100%
Key Analytics
Mean2.348
Key Facts
  • 60.87% chose the following options :
    • Fewer than 3 hours per week
    • 3-7 hours per week
Confidence Interval @ 95%[1.749 - 2.947]
n = 23
Standard Deviation1.465
Standard Error0.305

9. Please estimate how much time per semester faculty in your department spend on academic technology training (that is, training in a technology that is designed to enhance teaching and learning):
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Fewer than 5 hours per semester1359.09%
2.5-10 hours per semester627.27%
3.15-20 hours per semester29.09%
4.More than 20 hours per semester14.55%
5.Not applicable00.00%
Total22100%
Key Analytics
Mean1.591
Key Facts
  • 86.36% chose the following options :
    • Fewer than 5 hours per semester
    • 5-10 hours per semester
Confidence Interval @ 95%[1.234 - 1.948]
n = 22
Standard Deviation0.854
Standard Error0.182

10. What can IT do to maintain awareness of technology needs as they relate to the curriculum? (Please check all that are applicable):
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Conduct outreach by participating in various committees (e.g. curriculum, assessment)1310.32%
2.Conduct surveys or other formal information gathering on a regular basis97.14%
3.Create and update strategic plans for the delivery of academic technolgy services1814.29%
4.Informal observation97.14%
5.Faculty requests2419.05%
6.Monitor current practices and trends1511.90%
7.Invite instructors to participate in academic technology committees1411.11%
8.Maintain open and ongoing communication with faculty, students, and administrators in various settings.2217.46%
9.Other21.59%
Total126100%
Key Analytics
Mean4.944
Key Facts
  • 36.51% chose the following options :
    • Faculty requests
    • Maintain open and ongoing communication with faculty, students, and administrators in various settings.
  • Least chosen option 1.59% :
    • Other
Confidence Interval @ 95%[4.540 - 5.349]
n = 126
Standard Deviation2.316
Standard Error0.206

11. What are the barriers to faculty use of technology in the curriculum?
Frequency Analysis
Answer CountPercent
20%40%60%80%100%
1.Lack of time2215.17%
2.Dont know where to begin or who to call96.21%
3.Lack of recognition for this type of effort74.83%
4.Insufficient opportunities for training32.07%
5.Lack of demand or interest from students64.14%
6.Lack of tangible benefits such as consideration for promotion and tenure96.21%
7.Insufficient access to needed facilities and resources96.21%
8.Discomfort with technology138.97%
9.Satisfaction with existing level of technology use128.28%
10.Limited opportunities to collaborate with peers42.76%
11.Lack of best practice examples128.28%
12.Limited relevance of technology to my subject area74.83%
13.Inconvenient schedule of workshops and training sessions53.45%
14.Lack of needed equipment106.90%
15.Lack of opportunities for training42.76%
16.Lack of funding106.90%
17.Other32.07%
Total145100%
Key Analytics
Mean8.028
Key Facts
  • 24.14% chose the following options :
    • Lack of time
    • Discomfort with technology
  • Least chosen option 2.07% :
    • Insufficient opportunities for training
Confidence Interval @ 95%[7.221 - 8.834]
n = 145
Standard Deviation4.955
Standard Error0.412