This free survey is powered by
  1. Surveys
  2. 2016
  3. August
  4. A
  5. AH-GSM: Peer Review Feedback
0%
Questions marked with a * are required Exit Survey
 
 
* How many years’ experience do you have as a Sourcing/Procurement professional?
 
0 to 2 years
 
2 to 5 years
 
5 to 10 years
 
10+ Years
 
 
 
* How many years have you been part of the AH-GSM organization?
 
0 to 2 years
 
2 to 5 years
 
5 to 10 years
 
10+ Years
 
 
 
* Have you presented at Peer Review in the past 12 months?
 
Yes
 
No
 
 
 
* Please select how the Peer Review process makes you feel (choose all that apply):
 
I feel proud, it is a privilege to present to the LT and have the entire GSM on the line.
 
I feel excited, it is a great opportunity to share my work, and I feel very positive about it.
 
I feel safe, it is a good learning opportunity.
 
I feel neutral or impartial, presenting at Peer Review is part of the job. I have no particular emotions about it.
 
I feel anxious to present to the LT, if I could I would just present to my line manager and be done.
 
I feel afraid of presenting to the LT, if I could I would avoid it. It is my least favorite activity in my entire job description.
 
My business spend threshold does not qualify for the Peer Review process, so I will not likely present in Peer Review.
 
I have a lot more important things to do then present to Peer Review. The information shared at Peer Review does not generally apply to me.

 
 
Please consider the Peer Review Award Strategy Approval and Award Recommendation Approval (RTA) process when responding to the below (excludes Category Roadmap/Strategy):
Great Extent Moderate Extent Small Extent Not At All Unsure
* The Peer Review process is efficient and effective to a …
* I understand the differences between Award Strategy Approval and Award Recommendation Approval (RTA) to a …
* I understand exactly what I need to present at Peer Review to get “approved” the first time to a …
* The training I received prepared me to present at Peer Review to a …
* My manager provides the right level of support and guidance throughout the Peer Review process to a …
* I clearly understand the different roles of Local Procurement, Site, Regional and COE to a …
* When I present a Peer Review, the questions asked are relevant to a …
* When I explain the process to my stakeholders, they are supportive to a …
 
 
Please consider the Category Roadmap/Strategy (excludes Award Strategy Approval and Award Recommendation Approval (RTA)) process when responding to the below:
Great Extent Moderate Extent Small Extent Not At All Unsure
* The Category Roadmap/Strategy process is efficient and effective to a …
* The time allocated to present is sufficient to a …
* The training I received prepared me to present a Category Roadmap/Strategy to a …
* I am familiar with the Category Roadmap/Strategy template to a …
* I am proficient in the tools needed to build a Category Strategy to a …
 
 
The below are barriers to me participating in Peer Review:
Great Extent Moderate Extent Small Extent Not At All Unsure
* Language and/or English proficiency
* Clarity of sound/Conference Room equipment
* Peer Review Excel Template
* Category Roadmap/Strategy PowerPoint Template
* LT Question & Answer process
 
 
 
Please list 3 to 5 things you like about the Peer Review process:
   
 
 
 
Please list 3 to 5 things you would do differently in Peer Review:
   
 
 
 
Please identify obstacles that are preventing us from a successful process, where all GSM colleagues feel part of and look forward to actively participating in Peer Review. What inhibits participation in Peer Review either for you or others within the organization?