SHARE THIS REPORT:      
Survey Report : ccNSD - Day2
What did you find especially useful?
06/23/20092252302
06/23/20092255842
06/23/20092256144IDN deployment and its implications.
06/23/20092256199Discussion on geographic names, variants and fees in relation to IDN ccTLD fast-track. Presentations on contigency planning, ACRP, redundancy, Conficker.
06/23/20092256716In IDN we also include our reaction on the discussion on geographical names, since there is no box to tick for that. This was useful for us, but at the same time rather hopeless, since it seems that ICANN is not really listening to our concerns.
06/23/20092256815
06/23/20092257110.RU ppt on IDN implementation
06/24/20092261612
06/24/20092282079NICDE presentation
06/24/20092284988
06/24/20092285696AUsregistry's sharing of challenges and possible solutions for the deployment of IDN
06/24/20092287889
06/24/20092289185
06/24/20092292578
06/24/20092295810Contingency Planning and Business Continuity.
06/25/20092325189
06/27/20092382069
What did you find less useful?
06/23/20092252302
06/23/20092255842
06/23/20092256144
06/23/20092256199Nil.
06/23/20092256716
06/23/20092256815some of the slow bits - need to keep up the energy and interest.
06/23/20092257110Meeting with half of our Board reps.
06/24/20092261612
06/24/20092282079
06/24/20092284988
06/24/20092285696
06/24/20092287889
06/24/20092289185
06/24/20092292578
06/24/20092295810Administrative session
06/25/20092325189IDN's discussions are not in the interest of everybody's
06/27/20092382069
Was there anything you were missing?
06/23/20092252302
06/23/20092255842
06/23/20092256144
06/23/20092256199IPv6 and ENUM updates
06/23/20092256716This day we should really have had scribe when discussing policy, especially the first part of the day. Is it a possibility for further meetings to gather these discussions on the same day, so that these discussions are covered by scribe? And then have presentations on the day we do not have scribe and other things that do not need to be documented to the same degree.
06/23/20092256815
06/23/20092257110Michael Silber
06/24/20092261612
06/24/20092282079
06/24/20092284988
06/24/20092285696
06/24/20092287889
06/24/20092289185
06/24/20092292578
06/24/20092295810Not quite sure what this question means - I think I answered it for Day 1 but may have understood question incorrectly
06/25/20092325189
06/27/20092382069
Do you have any suggestions of topics/improvements for upcoming ccNSO meetings:
06/23/20092252302
06/23/20092255842
06/23/20092256144
06/23/20092256199ther Impacts of New gTLD on ccTLD - apart from geographic names
06/23/20092256716
06/23/20092256815
06/23/20092257110Shorten most ppts to max 15 mins. Save some time by having sponsors speak during lunch?
06/24/20092261612
06/24/20092282079
06/24/20092284988
06/24/20092285696
06/24/20092287889
06/24/20092289185
06/24/20092292578
06/24/20092295810DNSSEC - not much non-technical policy discussion
WHOIS & privacy of data
06/25/20092325189
06/27/20092382069