This free survey is powered by
  1. Surveys
  2. 2014
  3. October
  4. F
  5. Field Insights: USA Surgeons
0%
Exit Survey
 
 
Surgeon Name
   
 
 
 
Type of User
 
Non-user
 
New User (<25 cases)
 
User (>25 cases)
 
Early User or Clinical Investigator
 
 
 
Percentage of ATTUNE Usage
 
25%
 
50%
 
75%
 
100%
 
Unknown
 
 
 
Surgeon Knee Volume
 
25-100/yr
 
100-250/yr
 
250+/yr
 
 
 
Sales Rep
   
 
 
 
Territory #
   
 
 
 
Current/Previous Knee System
 
DePuy Synthes
 
Stryker
 
Zimmer
 
Biomet
 
Smith & Nephew
 
Conformis
 
DJO
 
Medacta
 
Other
 
 
 
Construct/Philosophy
 
PS
 
CR
 
CS
 
FB
 
RP
 
Uses Custom Made Instruments
 
CPI/TruMatch
 
Measured Sizer
 
Gap Balancer
 
Anterior Cut First
 
Laminar Spreaders
 
Anatomic Alignment
 
Outpatient/ASCs
 
CAS/Navigation
 
Minimally Invasive
 
Uses the ATTUNE Balancer
 
 
 
Meeting Forum
 
OR Visit
 
Non-OR Visit
 
Prof Ed Event
 
 
 
Surgeon Concern
 
Stability
 
ROM
 
Mid Flexion Instability
 
Cost/Price
 
Learning Curve
 
Asymmetric Tibia
 
Cruciate Sacrificing
 
No Support of My Surgical Approach
 
Clinical Results of Implant
 
Clinical Results of Poly
 
Lack of Stemable Tray
 
Lack of Revision Platform
 
Lack of Cementless Offering
 
Sizing of Instruments Too Large
 
Availability of 7N Femur
 
Availability of 9mm Poly
 
Doesn't Like Floating Tibial Trial Tray/Wants to Pin Anterior Cortex
 
Too Many Steps/Over Complicated for Surgical Workflow
 
Instrument(s)
 
Metal Sensitivity/Advanced Coatings
 
Having Challenges with ATTUNE Balancer
 
Surgeon Not Motivated to Change
 
Surgeon Agreed to Try ATTUNE
 
Happy Customer
 
Other
 
Share This Survey:          Survey Software Powered by QuestionPro Survey Software