This free survey is powered by
  1. Surveys
  2. 2015
  3. July
  4. A
  5. ATD-1 Lessons Learned
0%
Exit Survey
 
 
Hello:
The ATM Technology Demonstration-1 (ATD-1) is a major collaborative effort between the FAA and NASA. As stakeholders of ATD-1, we request your participation in our ATD-1 Lessons Learned survey.  This survey will take approximately 10 minutes to complete.

Your participation in this study is completely voluntary. There are no foreseeable risks associated with this project. However, if you feel uncomfortable answering any questions, you can withdraw from the survey at any point. It is very important for us to learn your opinions.

Your survey responses will be strictly confidential and data from this research will be reported only in the aggregate. Your information will be coded and will remain confidential. If you have questions at any time about the survey or the procedures, you may contact Matt Modderno at 202-267-5151, or by email at [email protected].

Thank you very much for your time and support. Please start with the survey now by clicking on the Continue button below.
 
 
 
1.Which agency are you with?
   
 
 
Was the ATD-1 activity under the EFICA RTT initiated at the appropriate stage of the Terminal Sequencing and Spacing research? (Too early, just right, too late)
Too early Early On time Late Too late
 
 
 
Were roles and responsibilities determined at an appropriate stage for all ATD-1?
Too early Early On Time Late Too late
 
 
 
 
Was this clearly communicated to the group?
 
Yes
 
No
 
 
 
Were the objectives of the ATD-1 activity well understood?
 
Yes
 
No
 
 
 
Was the ATD-1 activity successful in meeting milestones and deadlines?
 
Yes
 
No
 
 
How valuable were the joint FAA and NASA simulation activities?
Very valuable Valuable Some Value Not Very Valuable No value
 
 
 
How successful was the ATD-1 activity in aligning goals (e.g. IM-S, TSS) between NASA and the FAA?
Extremely Successful Moderately Successful Successful with some, and not with others Somewhat Unsuccessful Extremely Unsuccessful
 
 
 
Was the engagement at the executive level frequent enough?
Much Too Frequent Too Frequent Just Right Not Very Frequent Not Frequent Enough
 
 
 
How would you rate the frequency of working level communications (e.g. telcons, meetings)?
Much Too Frequent Too Frequent Just Right Not Very Frequent Not Frequent Enough
 
 
 
How would you rate the effectiveness of working level communications?
Very Effective Effective Sometimes Effective, Sometimes Not Effective Ineffective Not Effective at All
 
 
 
How would you rate your influence in the strategy and direction of the ATD-1 activity?
No Influence at All Some Influence A Lot of Influence
 
 
 
 
The major components of the package consisted of: public outreach materials, high level publications, technical publications, cost/benefit assessment publications, STARS prototype development publications, avionics development publications, TMA development publications, ATD-1 simulation outbriefs and ATD-1 project-level documents. Are these the right things to include?
 
Yes
 
No
 
 
How valuable (rate the utility) were the artifacts (e.g. Tech Transfer Packages, publishing) that were produced through the ATD-1 activity?
Very valuable Valuable Some value Little Value No Value at All
Public outreach materials
High level publications
Technical publications
Cost/benefit assessment publications
STARS prototype development publications
Avionics development publications
TMA development publications
ATD-1 simulation outbriefs
ATD-1 project-level documents
 
 
More regular intervals with smaller pieces delivered on a regular basis would have been better than a large transfer package containing everything at once.
Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree
 
 
 
 
Should more artifacts been produced jointly between NASA and the FAA through the ATD-1 activity?
 
Yes
 
No
 
 
How would you rate the communication between organizations throughout the ATD-1 activity?
Very Poor Poor Neutral Good Excellent
 
 
 
Rate the effectiveness of engagement during the following phases of the ATD-1 activity:
Very low Low Moderate High Very high
Strategic planning and initial prototyping
Concept requirements and definition
Simulation Conduct
Tech Transfer
Initial investment analysis
Final investment analysis
 
 
Overall, please rate the value of the ATD-1 activity of the EFICA RTT
No Value at All Little Value Some value Valuable Very valuable
 
 
 
The joint ATD-1 activity successfully matured the Terminal Sequencing and Spacing capability.
Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree
 
 
 
 
What could have been done to successfully mature the Terminal Sequencing and Spacing capability?
   
 
 
 
Do you feel the final program requirements document accurately reflects the intended Terminal Sequencing and Spacing capability?
 
Yes
 
No
 
 
 
Should additional stakeholders been more or less involved at different stages of the ATD-1 activity?
 
More involved
 
Less involved
 
Same level of involvement
 
 
How would you rate the overall engagement between NASA and the FAA through the ATD-1 activity?
Excellent Good Average Poor Very poor
 
 
 
 
29. What are some areas that could be improved upon in the Tech transfer piece?
   
 
 
 
30. How could the RTT process be improved?
   
 
 
 
31. What are some opportunities for improvement on the FAA side?:
   
 
 
 
32. What are some opportunities for improvement on the NASA side?
   
 
 
 
33. Where are some areas that the FAA performed well?
   
 
 
 
34. Where are some areas that NASA performed well?