SIGN UP FREE
Survey Templates Surveys Public Private Partnerships in Central and Eastern

Public Private Partnerships in Central and Eastern

Public Private Partnerships in Central and Eastern Europe


What is the type of organisation you work for?
How many PPP projects in Central and Eastern Europe has your organisation been involved in its lifetime?
In which Central and Eastern European countries have these PPP projects been? (Hold Ctrl-key for multiple answers.)
In which country and city is the Reference Project based? (e.g. Poland, Warsaw)
Of which type is the Reference Project?
Which BOT-model has been used for the Reference Project?
In the country of the Reference Project, is there guidance on PPP in the form of Law?
Are there any PPP guidelines for "best practice" by an expert panel or a professional body?
Do you think there is significant government support for PPP?
Is there a competition law in place for tendering PPP contracts?

Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
The country where the Reference Project is located has a substantial track record.
Which funding was involved in the Reference Project?
On the Reference Project, what is the origin of the contractor?
Was there a Public Sector Comparator (a publicly financed benchmark) used to evaluate if PPP is better value than a conventional procurement?

Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
For the Reference Project, there was significant competition from contractors / operators.

Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
For the Reference Project, there was significant competition from design firms and engineering firms.
Some projects are procured as PPP because the required capital would not be available. On the Reference Project, was this the case?

Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
A conventional procurement would have been faster.
What have been the main drivers to use PPP on the Reference Project?
Would the concession rate change if there would be a change in design or specification at Preferred Bidder stage?

Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
PPP delivered better aesthetics on the Reference Project as compared to a conventional procurement.

Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
PPP delivered better functionality on the Reference Project as compared to conventional procurement.
Was there an independent design 'watchdog' involved (e.g. such as the CABE in the U.K.)?

Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Your organisation had involvement in the design process of the project.

Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
The end-user of the PPP object had an involvement in the desgin process (e.g. consultation).
Did the use of PPP on the Reference Project stimulate innovation / different approaches to achieve the specified design?
Do you think the Reference Project does deliver a better service standard than a conventional project would have delivered?
Has there been an evaluation by an independent party of the built quality and the service offered?
On the Reference Project, are any contractual provisions in place that would allow the authority to demand changes (e.g. change in scope or specification)?
Is the regular concession payment 100% for the use of the service or is it mixed (constant base rate plus payment dependent on use)?
What are the main risks on the Reference Project?
Are risks adequately allocated to avoid project failure?

Related templates and questionnaires