MIA Professional Qualification
Years of become qualified Chartered Accountant
This section consists of 13 comments Earnings Management scenarios to measure the ethical level. You just need to rate each scenario from: 1= ethical 2= questionable 3= moderate 4= serious 5= totally unethical
This information applies to the following two questions. The GM ordered division employees to defer all discretionary expenditures (e.g., postpone employee travel, advertising hiring maintenance) into the next accounting period, so the division could make its budgeted profit targets. Expected amount of deferrals: RM 150, 000.
This information applies to the following three questions. In September, the GM realized the division would need strong performance in the fourth quarter to reach its budget targets.
This information applies to the following two questions. At the beginning of December 1991, the GM realized the division would exceed its budgeted profit targets for the year.
This information applies to the following two questions. The next year, the division sold 70% of the written-off inventory, and a customer had indicated some interest in buying the rest of that inventory the following year. The GM ordered the division controller to write the inventory back up to full cost. This would involve a RM 210, 000 increase in the inventory asset value (which had been previously written down due to obsolescence) and a corresponding increase in net income. The GM’s motivation for recapturing the profit was:
This information applies to the following two questions. In November 1991, the division was straining to meet budget. The GM called the consulting firm that was doing some work for the division and asked that the firm do not send an invoice until next year. The firm agreed. Estimated work done but not invoiced:
In this section the questions are adopted and modified from the Ethics Position Questionnaire (EPQ)by Forsyth (1980). The questions are posed to measure personal moral philosophy. You just need to rate each scenario from: 1= strogly agree 2= agree 3= slightly agree 4= slightly disagree 5= disagree 6= strogly disagree
In this section the questions are adopted and modified from the questionnaire on Perceived Role of Ethics and Social Responsibility (PRESOR)by Singhakpadi(1996). The questions are posed to measure personal corporate social responsibility. You just need to rate each scenario from: 1= strogly agree 2= agree 3= slightly agree 4= slightly disagree 5= disagree 6= strogly disagree
|