SIGN UP FREE
Survey Templates Surveys Rear Area Security

Rear Area Security

Rear Area Security


Hello:

You are invited to participate in my survey regarding Rear Area Security. It will take approximately 5 minutes to complete the questionnaire.


Your participation in this study is completely voluntary. There are no foreseeable risks associated with this project. However, if you feel uncomfortable answering any questions, you can withdraw from the survey at any point. It is very important for us to learn your opinions.


Your survey responses will be stricly confidential and data from this research will be reported only in the aggregate. Your information will be coded and will remain confidential. If you have questions at any time about the survey or the procedures, you may contact MAJ Woolgar at 748-3268 or by email at the email address specified below.


Thank you very much for your time and support. Please start with the survey now by clicking on the Continue button below.


1. Branch Classification
2. Years of Military Experience
3. Duty Status
4. Rank
5. Combat Experience dealing with rear area security?

Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
6. Shortfalls in any area of rear area security (DTLOMPF) currently exist.

Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
7. Current doctrine is adequate in addressing and providing a framework for divisional leaders to successfully defend the rear area.

Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
8. Rear area security doctrine is not concise and consolidated for divisional and brigade level units.

Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
9. The TRADOC training base (BT, AIT) does an excellent job of training logistics soldiers in tactical proficiency.

Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
10. In general, the current TRADOC education system (AIT, OBC, BNCOC etc.) should provide more training of tactical field skills than is currently being offered.

Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
11. Focused training on collective battle drills at the squad level will have the more impact than other unit level training events to ensure tactical proficiency.

Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
12. In my opinion, Objective Force doctrine (decreased log footprint, advanced communications, unsecured lines of communications (MSRs), fewer log soldiers etc.) will have a negative impact on rear area security operations.

Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
13. The regimental (Unit Manning) officer assignment system will significanlty improve tactical proficiency of divisional log units.

Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
14. Replacing or reducing the length of resident courses such as PLDC, BNCOC, ANCOC, or CLC3 with distance learning or web-based instruction will improve the proficiency of those who participate.

Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
15. The organizational structure of the SBCT (ie no organic MP PLT) is robust enough to deal with rear area security threats.

Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
16. The addition of one organic INF Company dedicated as a Tactical Combat Force (TCF) would dramatically improve the rear area security for the BDE Commander.

Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
17. Current CSS assets provide adequate force protection and fire power to defeat level I threats and defend against level II & III threats.

Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
18. The Army needs to develop and maintain up-armored security vehicles that are organically assigned to tactical CSS units.

Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
19. Divisional rear area security issues will be improved though changes in emerging doctine of the SBCTs and Objective Force.
20. Feel free to include any comments that are of value.

Related templates and questionnaires