This free survey is powered by
  1. Surveys
  2. 2015
  3. April
  4. A
  5. ABET
0%
Exit Survey
 
 
We would like to invite you to participate in a short survey related to design of a software package for accreditation of academic programs in universities. This software will assist the faculty in producing data and documents for Course Folders and Self Study Reports. Input from professionals like yourself is needed to ensure a new software is properly designed. The survey should not take more than 5 minutes of your time. In return for your participation, you will receive a free license for the software when developed.Descriptive / Spacer Text Here
 
 
Profile Question:
Your Name:
University:
Department:
Email Address:
 
 
 
Country?
 
 
 
Q1: Have you been through the ABET accreditation process as an instructor, as ABET coordinator or as the chairperson other department?
 
Yes
 
No
 
 
 
Q2: Have you used any software designed specifically for assisting in producing data and documents for accreditation.
 
Yes
 
No
 
 
 
Q2a: Which software?
   
 
 
Q3: Assuming there is a software that assists faculty to generate certain outputs easily – and thus helps regulate academic processes as per the standards of ABET – Such output is listed in the following. How important would you rate these output streams on a scale of Extremely Important to Extremely Unimportant (5 point rating scale).
Extremely Important (5) Somewhat Important (4) Neither important nor unimportant (3) Somewhat Unimportant (2) Extremely Unimportant (1) Don’t know/Can't Say (9)
1)Instructor Contact Information, Office Hours, Class Schedule
2) Weekly teaching plan (including topics covered & hours)
3) Score Points Distribution for quizzes, homework, final exam etc for calculation of final grades.
4) Student Outcome (SOs will be introduced to the students, when, how they will be assessed)
5) Syllabus details (Objectives, Contents, Pre-requisites, Textbooks, Credit Hours)
6) CLOs (Course Learning Outcomes)
7) CLO-SO Matrix (Matrix of Course Learning Outcomes vs. Student Outcomes)
 
 
Q3a: Assuming there is a software that assists faculty to generate certain outputs easily – and thus helps regulate academic processes as per the standards of ABET – Such output is listed in the following. How important would you rate these output streams on a scale of Extremely Important to Extremely Unimportant (5 point rating scale).
Extremely Important (5) Somewhat Important (4) Neither important nor unimportant (3) Somewhat Unimportant (2) Extremely Unimportant (1) Don’t know/Can't Say (9)
8) Students' Final Scores (Numeical & Graphic output)
9) Students' CLO-wise Scores (Numeical & Graphic output)
10) Students' Question-wise Scores (Numeical & Graphic output)
11) CLO-wise Analysis of students scores
12) CLO satisfaction report for each assessment based on a pre-speicified satisfaction criterion
13) SO satisfaction report for each assessment based on a pre-speicified satisfaction criterion
14) Students' work samples for each assessment
 
 
Q3b: Should the following items be included in a faculty survey? Rate them for importance.
Extremely Important (5) Somewhat Important (4) Neither important nor unimportant (3) Somewhat Unimportant (2) Extremely Unimportant (1) Don’t know/Can't Say (9)
The Overall Environment for Learning Readiness and General Issues
Student Preparation Readiness and Weakness Areas
Satisfaction on CLO achievement rates
Syllabus Topics feedback
Improvement Methods
Loop closing suggestions
Student survey results (students perception on their abilities on grasping CLO)
 
 
Q4: In your opinion, how important are the following types of output?
Extremely Important (5) Somewhat Important (4) Neither important nor Unimportant (3) Somewhat Unimportant (2) Extremely Unimportant (1)
Report in PDF version
Graphical Output displayed online in Executive Dashboard format
Excel sheet tabulations of results
 
Share This Survey:          Survey Software Powered by  QuestionPro Survey Software