EADP SS 2015 Evaluation

Student Evaluation EADP SS 2015

Thanks for taking the five minutes it takes to participate.
Please fill in the following survey to help us improving the course for future students.
The evaluation will be completely anonymous.

What is your field of study?

Mechanical Engineering / Energy Engineering

Business Engineering

Others (incl. Electrical Engineering)

B.Sc. or M.Sc.?

B.Sc.

M.Sc.

Please rate the course

Course overall

Lectures

Project part

Pleas rate the following general statements about the course:

Compared to other courses, the course had a high workload and consumed much of my time.

The course was difficult to me.

I liked the overall structure of the course.

The classroom situation was friendly and inviting.

The lecture hall (H0106) was an adequate place for the course.

The supervisors were enthusiastic and took care of the course intensively.

I always felt well informed about organisational matters.

I would recommend the lecture to other students.

Please rate the following statements about the lecture phase:

The lectures were well structured.

I had problems in understand the lectures' topics.

The lecture slides were visually appealing and well-arranged.

It was easy for me to access the course's material.

The lectured provided me with new knowledge.

The lectures were interesting to me.

The content of the lectures helped me in project.

Student questions during the lectures were answered adequately.

The teacher tried to involve me during the lectures.

The teacher (Dawud) seemed competent and proved expertise in his field.

The teacher (Ahmad) seemed competent and proved expertise in his field.

The teacher's (Dawud) language and style of teaching made it easy to follow the lectures.

The teacher's (Ahmad) language and style of teaching made it easy to follow the lectures.

Please rate the following statements about the project phase:

I had a clear vision what to do during the project.

The supervisors' guidance helped me to structure my tasks.

The supervisors motivated me to present own ideas.

The system of groups worked well for me.

My efforts were valued by the supervisors.

I have a clear picture of the project's aim.

The system of presentations and discussions provided a good platform for me to get involved.

The teacher's (Hashem) language and style of explaining things made it easy to follow his presentations.

A few keywords please: I (especially) liked ...

A few keywords please: I (especially) disliked ...

Last words / Comments / What should be improved.