This free survey is powered by
0%
Questions marked with an * are required Exit Survey
 
 
This is a short survey carried out by the independent evaluation team together with the Independent Evaluation Unit, UNODC for the independent mid-term evaluation of the UNODC global project GLOX69 Joint Action Towards a Global Regime Against Corruption.

The objective of the evaluation is to understand preliminary un/achieved results of the programme as well as to assess its relevance, effectiveness, efficiency and issue recommendations based on lessons learned and best practices to support future programming and effective implementation of GLOX69 until September 2016. The independent evaluation team would appreciate your assistance through completion of this short, anonymous questionnaire.

While the evaluation team appreciates that some respondents have already been interviewed, and some will be in the near future, we would be grateful for your responses to this brief questionnaire in order to draw quantitative data and more insight from you for future programming.

For any questions, please contact the Evaluation Team Leader Ms. Emmanuelle Diehl at [email protected]

Thank you very much for your participation!
 
 
BACKGROUND
 
Please include your email-address in the box below (optional; please note that this information will not be shared with any third party and will be treated confidentially; for verification reasons only):
Email Address : 
 
 
 
* What is your role/position in relation to the Global Prject GLOX69?
 
UNODC staff
 
Donor
 
Recipient country/organisation/individual
 
Partner organisation (United Nations)
 
Partner organisation (NGO/CSO)
 
Partner organisation (others)
 
 
 
* In what part of the world do you, or have you, work(ed)? Please select as many as needed
 
North Africa and Middle East
 
Eastern Africa
 
South Africa
 
South East Asia
 
South Asia
 
Latin America and Caribbean
 
Small Islands Developing States
 
Global
 
Other
 

 
 
* Please precise the country(ies):
   
 
 
 
* Have you been directly involved in implementing GLOX69’s activities (e.g. technical assistance; trainings; etc.)?
 
Yes
 
No
 
 
 
* In which activities of GLOX69 have you been directly involved (tick all that are applicable):
 
Ratification/accession of UNCAC
 
UNCAC review mechanism
 
Peer country for UNCAC review mechanism
 
Capacity building for application of UNCAC
 
Development of national/regional strategies/action plans
 
Revision legislation
 
Training recipient
 
Conference on knowledge sharing/south south cooperation
 
None

 
 
 
 
 
MAIN QUESTIONS
 
 
 
* Design: To what extent has GLOX69 been designed to clearly identify the needs and priorities of UNODC’s government counterparts in targeted regions?
 
Cleary identified
 
Partially identified
 
Not identified
 
Don’t know
 
 
Relevance: Please specify how relevant the different activities of GLOX69 have been for your country/organisation/institution/government.
Very relevant Relevant Partially relevant Not relevant Don't know N/A
* Technical assistance on the ratification of UNCAC
* Designing national strategies for the implementation of UNCAC
* Technical assistance on the implementation of UNCAC review mechanism
* Training of relevant institutions/bodies/professionals on UNCAC and money laundering and asset recovery mechanisms
* Support to conferences for experience sharing with other countries in your region
* Other
 
 
Please specify why certain activities have not been relevant, if any?
   
 
 
Please specify how their relevance can be improved?
   
 
 
Please specify what other type of activities/support you would you like UNODC to offer within the context of GLOX69?
   
 
 
 
* Implementation support: What is your overall level of satisfaction with the support provided by UNODC Headquarter through GLOX69 activities in your country?
 
Excellent
 
Very good
 
Satisfactory
 
Needs improvement
 
Unsatisfactory
 
Don't know
 
 
Please provide more detail, including any specific requests for the future:
   
 
 
 
* Efficiency: How efficient has the UNODC project management team been in co-ordinating the work of GLOX69?
 
Highly efficient
 
Efficient
 
Efficient to some extent
 
Not efficient
 
Don't know
 
 
Please provide more detail and, if any, including any specific requests for the future:
   
 
 
 
* Sustainability: What kind of activities, mechanisms and structures has GLOX69 been implementing/creating to foster sustainable results?
   
 
 
Human Rights: In your opinion, how well addressed are human rights issues in GLOX69 activities?
Fully addressed Mostly addressed Partially addressed Not addressed Don't know
* Capacity Building
* Legislative support
* Review Mechanism
 
 
Please add any further comment you might have regarding how the project addressed Human Rights
   
 
 
Gender equality: In your opinion, how well addressed are gender issues in GLOX69 activities?
Fully addressed Mostly addressed Partially addressed Not addressed Don't know
* Capacity Building
* Legislative support
* Review Mechanism
 
 
Please add any further comment you might have regarding how the project addressed Gender Equality
   
 
 
How satisfied are you with the following aspects of GLOX69?
Very satisfied Satisfied Partially satisfied Unsatisfied Don't know
* Support provided by the project management at Headquarter
* Building and reinforcement of partnerships
* Coordination and communication
* Efforts to foster South South cooperation
* Trainings, workshops, conferences and meetings
* Tools, manuals, etc.
* Quality and delivery of the various activities
* Technical assistance on the ratification of UNCAC/ implementation of UNCAC review mechanism
 
 
Please specify what aspects you are less satisfied with, if any, and the reason why:
   
 
 
 
* Partnerships and cooperation: From your point of view, to what extent has GLOX69 supported the establishment of regional/international cooperation?
 
Fully
 
Partially
 
Not at all
 
Don't know
 
 
Please specify why the project has not supported the establishment of regional/international cooperation:
   
 
 
 
* Effectiveness: How would you rate the overall effectiveness of cooperation under GLOX69?
 
Very effective
 
Effective
 
Partially effective
 
Ineffective
 
Don't know
 
 
Please specify, why you find the cooperation partially effective or ineffective:
   
 
 
 
* How well is GLOX69 aligned with national strategies and priorities?
 
Fully aligned
 
Mostly aligned
 
Partially aligned
 
Not aligned
 
Do not know
 
 
Please specify, why the global project is partially/not at all aligned
   
 
 
 
* Has the project contributed to the ratification or implementation of UNCAC?
 
Yes
 
No
 
Don't know
 
 
* What challenges have you faced in the ratification and implementation of UNCAC? If you have not yet ratified it, what challenges are you facing?
   
 
 
Impact: Are there any concrete tangible societal changes or effects that GLOX69 has generated during its implementation?
Yes No Don't know
* Changes in legislation
* Changes in judicial practices
* Influence in national strategies or action plans
* Enhanced professional skills and expertise
* Increased public awareness and knowledge base
* Other
 
 
 
* Please specify what changes in the legislative framework of your country have happened as a result of the implementation of activities under GLOX69.
   
 
 
 
 
 
Please answer the following questions if you can - thank you!
 
 
 
Please identify some good/best practices that have emerged from the implementation of GLOX69.
   
 
 
 
Please identify some “worst practices” of GLOX69.
   
 
 
 
Please provide suggestions for ways to improve the quality and delivery of the activities under GLOX69.
   
 
 
 
Please provide any further comment you might have regarding GLOX69