This free survey is powered by
  1. Surveys
  2. 2015
  3. January
  4. L
  5. Levy Integration - Lessons Learned
0%
Exit Survey
 
 
Hello:
Your participation is requested for the Levy Integration lessons learned survey.  The survey has 44 questions and takes approximately 15 minutes to complete.  Responses are strictly confidential and data only reported in the aggregate.  

Thank you and please start the survey by clicking the Continue button below.
 
PROJECT PLANNING

Stakeholders: Business/Functional Owners, Team Leads

Strongly agree Somewhat agree Neither agree nor disagree Somewhat disagree Strongly disagree N/A
Project Plan and Schedule were well-documented with appropriate structure and detail
Tasks were adequately defined
Requirements were gathered to sufficient detail and clearly documented
Success Metrics were clearly defined at onset of project
Test Plan was adequate, understandable, and well-documented
Stakeholders had appropriate input into the project planning process (e.g. Business Owners, Team Leads)
Project Plan had buy-in from the stakeholders
Stakeholders had easy access to Project Plan and Schedule
Procedure for capturing and agreeing to business process was adequate
Timeliness of decision making regarding business process was adequate
 
 
What did we do well planning the project?
   
 
 
What can we do better planning the project?
   
 
PROJECT EXECUTION & DELIVERY
Strongly agree Somewhat agree Neither agree nor disagree Somewhat disagree Strongly disagree N/A
Project stuck to its original goals
Changes in direction that did occur were of manageable frequency and magnitude
Basic project management processes were adequate (e.g. Risk Management, Issue Management)
Project tracked progress against baselines and reported accurate status
Kronos - Procurement went smoothly (e.g. SOW, SSS)
Presence of IT (Mike Josephson) - Procurement went smoothly (e.g. SOW, SSS)
Kronos – Provided acceptable deliverables on time and within budget
Presence of IT (Mike Josephson) – Provided acceptable deliverables on time and within budget
Risks were communicated and manageable
Impacted team members were adequately trained
Adequate training and communication material was provided for reference after go-live
 
 
What did we do well with execution and delivery?
   
 
 
What can we do better with execution and delivery?
   
 
HUMAN FACTORS

Project Team: All resources responsible for executing tasks and producing deliverables as outlined in the Project Plan, per the effort/participation that was defined for them. This includes resources involved in project oversight and control, stakeholders that have special interest in the outcome of the project, and those providing task/technical leadership.

Strongly agree Somewhat agree Neither agree nor disagree Somewhat disagree Strongly disagree N/A
Project Managers were effective
Project Team was properly organized and staffed with appropriate talent and experience
Project Team worked effectively on project goals
Project Team worked effectively with outside entities (e.g. Kronos, Presence of IT)
There was good communication within the Project Team
Project Team members displayed proper meeting etiquette
Conflict management between Project Team members and functional areas were adequately managed
Management gave this project adequate attention and time
Resources were not over-committed
Functional areas cooperated well
Conflicting departmental goals did not cause problems
Authority and accountability were well defined and public
 
 
What did we do well with human factors?
   
 
 
What can we do better with human factors?
   
 
OVERALL
Strongly agree Somewhat agree Neither agree nor disagree Somewhat disagree Strongly disagree N/A
Initial cost and schedule estimates were accurate
External dependencies were understood and well-managed
End results met the original desired results
 
 
What did we do well overall?
   
 
 
What can we do better overall?
   
Share This Survey:          Online Survey Tool Powered by  QuestionPro Survey Software