| The RAC assessments were prepared by qualified individuals.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The RAC assessments were prepared in time for the revocation hearing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The parolees were willing participants in the assessment process.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The parole officers and hearing officers were able to review the assessments prior to, during and/or after the revocation hearing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The assessments contained information not normally available at a non-RAC revocation hearing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The assessments were complete and thorough.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The assessments were a valuable tool to the parole officers and hearing officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The assessments allowed the parole officers and hearing officers to make a more informed recommendation regarding the revocation hearing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The RAC was a positive and cost-effective alternative to county jail or state prison.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The RAC is a worthwhile endeavor and should be re0instated in its original form.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loading...
