This free survey is powered by
  1. Surveys
  2. 2014
  3. October
  4. S
  5. SC Milling Aluminum - Needs
0%
Exit Survey
 
 
Please Complete the following short survey to the best of your ability. I will use the information to expand the Supreme line of milling cutters for Aluminum (MB265 & MB266) into a complete inch program with corner radius.

I will send a separate survey asking for forecasts at a later time.

Luke Pollock

Product Manager​
 
 
 
* In which District do you work?
 
ENA
 
EMA
 
ESA
 
EGC
 
COI
 
CWI
 
CME
 
CMW
 
WNC
 
WSC
 
WSP
 
WNP
 
Other
 
 
 
 
Looking at the history of the Sky-tec product family, going back to 2009, the tools generated virtually no sales. In your personal opinion, why did the Sky-tec product family fail to generate sales of any significance
   
 
 
 
* Is the market in your area large enough to support a standard inch program of solid carbide milling tools for Aluminum, assuming the product is properly supported?
 
Yes
 
No
 
 
 
* How successful could we be with a program that is only an expansion of the MB266 program (Z=3, uncoated, coolant thru, various corner rads, shank ground for longer reaches).
 
1 - Unsuccessful
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10 - Successful
 
 
 
* Which Variations do we need to include in the standard offering for the program to be effective? (for example “Overall Length” – Do we need different length options of the same diameter, corner rad, etc…… Or will one Length be sufficient? “Number of Teeth” - Do we need both Z=2 and Z=3, or will only having one choice be sufficient.).
 
Diameter
 
Corner Radius
 
Overall Length
 
Length of Cut
 
Coatings
 
Rougher (MB265) / Finisher (MB266)
 
Z=2 / Z=3
 
Coolant Thru Variations
 
Other
 

 
 
 
* Which Variation of Corner Radius is more prefered with your existing customers?
 
.030" / .060" / .090" / .120"
 
1/32" / 1/16" / 3/32" / 1/8" ........
 
 
 
* Please drag and rank, in order of most important, the corner radius's used in your market area.
Drag your choices here to rank them
     
     
     
    * Do we need Diameters Smaller than ø1/2"?
     
    Yes
     
    No
     
     
     
    * Do we need Diameters Larger than ø1"?
     
    Yes
     
    No
     
    Thank you for your participation.