This free survey is powered by
0%
Exit Survey
 
 
Hello:
You are invited to participate in our survey in rating the Sergeants at SF State PD. In this survey, Corporals and Officers are encouraged to participate.  You will be asked to complete a survey that asks questions about the Sergeants' ability to lead, mentor, and develop subordinate officers as well as meet Vice President Hong's and Interim Chief Parson's expectations for moving our department in the "Right Direction."  You will be able to share your opinion in the Comment section of each topic.  Please feel free to share their Strengths and Weaknesses or any other pertinent information to substantiate your rating. The system for rating will be from 1-5 with an option to include specific comments or examples.  It will take approximately 15 minutes to complete the questionnaire.

Your participation in this study is completely voluntary. There are no foreseeable risks associated with this project. However, if you feel uncomfortable answering any questions, you can withdraw from the survey at any point.  Your survey responses will be strictly confidential and data from this research will be reported only in the aggregate. Your information will be coded and will remain CONFIDENTIAL.  Please start with the survey now by clicking on the Continue button below.
 
 
 
Please select which Sergeant is your current supervisor. 
 
Sgt Lam
 
Sgt Leal
 
Sgt Haymond
 
Sgt Balistreri
 
Sgt Liddi
 
Sgt Rodriquez
 
Sgt Tang
 
Sgt Wilson
 
 
 
Your Sergeant performs supervisory tasks, leads by example without bias or favoritism, and makes unbiased sound decisions.
 
5 = Superior
 
4 = Exceeds Duty Requirements
 
3 = Meets Duty Requirements
 
2 = Needs Some Improvement
 
1 = Needs Much Improvement
 
Comment
 
 
 
Your Sergeant has knowledge of current laws, department procedures, and adheres to the prescribed General Orders without deviation or making exceptions to meet own agenda or personal motive.
 
5 = Superior
 
4 = Exceeds Duty Requirements
 
3 = Meets Duty Requirements
 
2 = Needs Some Improvement
 
1 = Needs Much Improvement
 
Comment
 
 
 
Your Sergeant shows interest & enthusiasm for duties and shows positive attitude toward the department's mission and new direction of the administration.
 
5 = Superior
 
4 = Exceeds Duty Requirements
 
3 = Meets Duty Requirements
 
2 = Needs Some Improvement
 
1 = Needs Improvement
 
Comment
 
 
 
Your Sergeant Is successful in working with others without showing bias or preferential treatment (cronyism). 
 
5 = Superior
 
4 = Exceeds Duty Requirements
 
3 = Meets Duty Requirements
 
2 = Needs Some Improvement
 
1 = Needs Much Improvement
 
Commnent
 
 
 
Your Sergeant takes pride in dress appearance and creates a favorable image to faculty, staff, students and co-workers and adheres to uniform and grooming regulations prescribed by G.O.'s.  
 
5 = Superior
 
4 = Exceeds Duty Requirements
 
3 = Meets Duty Requirements
 
2 = Needs Some Improvement
 
1 = Needs Much Improvement
 
Comment
 
 
 
Your Sergeant observes working hours and proper use of sick leave for themselves as well as their team members and does not show favoritism or preferential treatment for time off requests. 
 
5 = Superior
 
4 = Exceeds Duty Requirements
 
3 = Meets Duty Requirements
 
2 = Needs Some Improvement
 
1 = Needs Much Improvement
 
Comment
 
 
 
Your Sergeant performs well during stress and time of emergency to the point to where you feel confident that your Sergeant can handle any emergency situation you may need leadership in.  
 
5 = Superior
 
4 = Exceeds Duty Requirements
 
3 = Meets Duty Requirements
 
2 = Needs Some Improvement
 
1 = Needs Much Improvement
 
Comment
 
 
 
Of all the Sergeants listed above who would you rate as the top three Sergeants (1 being the closest or best fit, 3 being least) that meet the criteria listed and why, please elaborate in comments section.
 
 
Comments
 
Share This Survey:          Online Survey Tool Powered by  QuestionPro Survey Software