This free survey is powered by

Test - Cmte on Stem Cells and Regenerative Med.

0%
Exit Survey
 
 
The American Society of Hematology (ASH) is committed to providing high-quality, objective, balanced, scientifically rigorous continuing medical education (CME) activities that are free from bias. Efforts have been made to ensure that information presented at this meeting meets these standards. Real-time, peer evaluation of the Scientific Program sessions is intended to validate safeguards already in place and document deviations from the educational planning criteria for CME activities set by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education and ASH’s Conflict-of-Interest (COI) Policy. It is also intended to assess the quality of the science presented in the Scientific Program to make sure it remains high and cutting-edge, and to evaluate the ASH Scientific Committees. ASH appreciates your assistance with the peer evaluation process.
 
 
Session topic was timely and subject matter reflected the state of the art of the scientific field represented by this Scientific Committee.
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
 
 
 
Chair and Speakers provided appropriate background, context, significance and relevance of the scientific topic to disease.
 
 
 
You would recommend the speakers of this session for future ASH meetings.
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
Hans Clevers
Elaine Fuchs
Amy J. Wagers
 
 
 
In your opinion, the Scientific Committee on Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine continues to meet a need for ASH attendees.
Yes
No
 
 
 
Chair and Speakers were an expert in their field
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
 
 
 
Please provide any additional comments or suggestions in the space below. You can use this space to nominate yourself or your colleagues to serve on this scientific committee or suggest topics for future meetings:
   
 
Share This Survey:          Online Survey Software Powered by  QuestionPro Survey Software