This free survey is powered by
0%
 
 
We would be very grateful for feedback on your experiences over the last semester. This should take between 5 and 10 minutes.All data / comments are collected and anonymised by the Quality Enhancement Office (QEO). The QEO guarantee that no individual will ever be identified with specific ratings or comments. All anonymised data and comments are read by both RCSI Quality Assurance Staff and relevant Academic Staff and they are used to draw-up a Quality Improvement Plan to allow the continuous evolution of the RCSI teaching program.Your feedback is crucial - tell us what you think

..........................................................

Looking back on the modules that you have completed this semester, please rate your level of agreement with each of the following statements. In cases where statements do not apply to you, please check the 'Not Applicable' option.
 
 
This module achieved its learning outcomes
Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
M9&10: Cardiovascular + Respiratory
M11: Endocrine System
M12&13: Neuroscience
M14: Population & International Health (PIH)
M15: Evidence Based Health (EBH)
M16: Clinical Competencies
 
 
 
If you answered 'Disagree' or 'Strongly Disagree' to any of the above please tell us your reasons why:
   
 
 
 
Please use the space below to provide any additional comments for each Module. We are particularly interested in what worked well and what could be improved in each Module.
 
 
 
M9&10: Cardiovascular + Respiratory
   
M11: Endocrine System
   
M12&13: Neuroscience
   
M14: Population & International Health (PIH)
   
M15: Evidence Based Health (EBH)
   
M16: Clinical Competencies
   
 
 
 
Should the HLTM Group Project contain a ‘Peer Marking’ element?
 
 
 
Why should the HLTM group project not contain a peer marking element?
   
 
 
 
Which of these courses were particularly challenging for you? (select all that apply)
 
M9&10: Cardiovascular + Respiratory
 
M11: Endocrine System
 
M12&13: Neuroscience
 
M14: Population & International Health (PIH)
 
M15: Evidence Based Health (EBH)
 
M16: Clinical Competencies
 
None of them

 
 
 
The prescribing component of the second session was useful
 
Strongly agree
 
Agree
 
Neither agree nor disagree
 
Disagree
 
Strongly Disagree
 
 
 
You said you that the prescribing component of the second session was useful, please state your reasons why.
   
 
Share This Survey:          Online Survey Software Powered by  QuestionPro Survey Software